it seems that there is going to be a review of the family court - and it seems that pauline hanson is going to be involved in the review etc etc and some people are not happy that she is on the comittee because of comments that she has made.
the idea that women should simply be believed because they make allegations is total nonsense - because they can tell monster lies
there is no penalty for lying in the family court - and watso knows perfectly well how much women can lie. watso was accused of everything - and was subject to an assessment to see if he and the children would be at risk if watso were to see the children .. ie watso should not be allowed to see the children.
anyway watso was cleared - and eventually everything boiled down to having to see a shrink - but the ex had no option to see the shrink herself - and then she capitulated and watso got custody
watso previously commented on the matter in post
Post #:31605361 with the thread header of "horrible nasty mean watso"
mmmm looking through that thread, watso noticed
Post #:34455807, where watso posted the capitulation fax from the ex..
mmm looking at that fax - and all watso can say is that the distress expressed by the ex, was inversely matched by the exhileration experienced by watso .
the ex had simply drowned in a quagmire of lies ...
there should be penalties for lying in the family court - that will sort things out a bit.. a prison term or two would make people think twice
