Purposive interpretation is VERY popular these days, across most jurisdictions but especially in courts with international reach...
FARJOY's take is nothing new at all: the literal construction WPL is relying on is that they bought a company, not an asset, and the JOA PE terms only mention assets. Whereas FAR is arguing that in this case you should go beneath the face of the terms to determine the intent, namely that it doesn't matter what you call the thing, it represents an asset that qualifies for PE.
Purposive interpretation is VERY popular these days, across most...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FAR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
50.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(2.91%) |
Mkt cap ! $46.20M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 52.5¢ | 52.5¢ | 50.0¢ | $45.91K | 88.73K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 5993 | 50.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 50.5¢ | 5982 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.08pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FAR (ASX) Chart |