I spoke to Dr Mollard some time ago and we discussed the dog...

I spoke to Dr Mollard some time ago and we discussed the dog trials - prior to the commencement. He was working on approvals documentation for the various states to have the multiple sites participate in our trial.

My understanding is that UVet managed the trial but that the onboarding of locations to participate & UVet to manage was almost completely on PharmAust. The discussion was about how difficult it was to have the variety of requirements across states met, providing almost identical info in many formats etc

The recruiting of patients - I believe that was a joint effort. UVet and other locations funded / incentivised to have dogs assessed and if ok, join - PharmAust paid but UVet controlled completely. Whereas PharmAust managed/funded the influencer, the pet reporter and did a few ads.

We should all be mindful that entry criteria would have been very tight to ensure they had dogs at a certain stage of cancer development and not undergoing any other treatment, and with willing owners, plus more, which makes things very challenging to find suitable ones.

this is my understanding

adreamer