Hi Brown,
The requirement is to be broadly equivalent to devices made before 1978 - not current market devices.
Immuno-assay devices have been around for a long time - the chemical process that urine based devices use, so equivalency should not be an issue with the right information submitted. Sun needed to go through the process as a slap on the wrist for failing to submit paperwork properly as per the April letter from the FDA.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- fda 510k approval
Hi Brown,The requirement is to be broadly equivalent to devices...
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)