FDA Application for Orphan Drug Designation , PAA, MPL, page-54

While I get the point that MND progression is the focus, do you not think it reasonable the directors explain this part of PAA's history. The view you seem to express is, that everything else can fall/fail around them and we shouldn't ask questions because you know they are looking at MND. Get out of jail free card.

Surely if there is nothing to see it will be very straight forward for the directors to explain and I'm sure the rhyme and reason. And if there is some questionable behaviour then the law should be brought against them. But I'm guessing it is all above board legally.

I'd be interested to know who is associated with the entity who bought it. Getting what was a profit-making company for peanuts...

The question should be why the directors shut shop rather than try sale and do any of them have any association with the buyers.