I wanted to see what previous instances of the FDA going against the ODAC Adcom voting and the eventual outcome looked like.

Found that it's only happened 6 times.

Looks like we have a real shot being a novel treatment!

The review was published last week: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43441-020-00194-4

Does anyone have access to the springer portal and the full review? And maybe links to the actual six instances in question?

Disagreements Between FDA and its Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC)

Abstract

Cases of discordance between the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its advisory committees are uncommon. Due to the importance of oncology therapies, we sought to identify and discuss instances of disagreement between the regulatory decision made by FDA, and the recommendation made by its Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee (ODAC) via committee vote. Public databases (Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Materials, Drugs@FDA) as well as publicly available documents from ODAC meetings were reviewed to discern cases of disagreement between the two bodies. This review of public data yielded six (6) instances in which FDA’s ultimate regulatory decision went against the recommendation of the ODAC. The six cases are briefly discussed and key drivers for or against an approval decision are outlined. In cases where FDA’s decision was less conservative than that of the ODAC, the value of therapies with novel mechanisms of action which provide new options for patients, as well as regulatory precedent were observed as key drivers for regulatory decision-making. In cases where FDA took a more conservative approach than the ODAC, the importance of appropriate clinical trial design, clinically relevant trial endpoints, and the integrity of the data collected were stressed as driving the ultimate regulatory decision.