feeling railroaded, page-2

DF has already mentioned that there is a case for a rail provider to build a railway and AGO will use that capacity.

That all depends on cost of building of course so if more than one miner can be serviced it looks more viable.

Depends on where the mines are located, stranded deposits are way less likely to proceed.

I like the idea of using someone elses debt structure to transport the iron, until that happens I am more than happy with road which is a relatively fixed cost.

So no biggie imv, the press love raising issues, what we should be looking at is who gets the co-benefit of a railway.

ifandwhen