so to expand on the above [ATTACH] nothing to do with the 12...

so to expand on the above



nothing to do with the 12 lifescience companies we are dealing with. nothing to stop the continued supply to serum institute of india with their initial $260k order



and nothing to do with the cost saving results for ev1. this had nothing to do with our high silicon anode tech.

if we had some of our ip for our high silicon taken by ferro, it wouldn't be ideal at all. but if you want to research all those patents we have lapsed and abandoned that I posted yesterday, there is huge amount of battery configuration and techniques we have used.

How much impact to that, would a silicon supplier add. they don't produce binders. they don't produce batteries. they highly refine silicon (from grigor's article we now buy unrefined silicon for $8/kg ). there would be over 1000 pages of technical data in those patents. what % would a silicon refiner have in the development of our high silicon anode tech. certainly nowhere near 100% !!!!