item 21 and 22, i think, hilight what I suspect is a key to the...

item 21 and 22, i think, hilight what I suspect is a key to the case: disagreements on timeline. as part of the MOU collaboration, did Manuel learn something from Ferro that gave us the key to silicon? or had the energy division been looking at silicon previously - potentially instigating interest in partnering to pool resources with ferro in the first place, when eventually ado scientists realized metallurgical would work and the mou plug was pulled?

I think those will be the two sides being presented and pressure is being put on to prove from correspondence and documented evidence from experimentation

I think ferro will fish for research purposes and file court costs under R&D.

I think ADO is either being evasive about how much ferro researched influenced their own research outcomes or just trying avoid ferro's poaching avarice.

I hope it is the latter. I suspect it may be some of the former but hopefully more like previous posters have suggested: ferro research has led anteo scientists to the empurical conclusion that ferro's approach is needlessly expensive. I hope Nicholas doesn't give Ferro a red cent for that!