imo AIM did not instigate the litigation off their own bat. There will be people still within AIM very uncomfortable with this action.
NS have told them to start proceedings against Flory. They want AIM to use their own funds. Why should NS pay for it, they have already put a small fotune into the company. When NS stopped the action with AIM, this was no doubt the deal.
They want a pound of flesh for the lost funds.
imo AIM did not instigate the litigation off their own bat....
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AIM (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
80.0¢ |
Change
-0.010(1.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $167.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 81.0¢ | 81.0¢ | 77.0¢ | $159.2K | 201.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 700 | 77.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 80.0¢ | 3649 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 04/10/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AIM (ASX) Chart |