$1 per share would be amazing but is fanciful in this market...

$1 per share would be amazing but is fanciful in this market with the track record MHM have. Phil Thick certainly put the company back on track and demonstrated how a tech startup should be run, ie on an oily rag. If Aussie operations can generate a NPAT of $1 million we'd be laughing, but would take someone with deep pockets and risk appetite to get US ops up and running, Alcoa might be up for it but they're going to drive a very hard bargain given the historic support they've provided, IF the process is proven to be profitable, it'll only be marginally so and on the basis of Alcoa paying up - how does this compare with US landfill cost? I doubt MHM holders would see more than 50c a share plus huge dilution. Happy to keep dreaming, I mean holding.