Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

"The smocking gun was smocking but they had nobody in a high...

First 76 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
narrowspec

3,064 Posts.

10/12/19

23:20

Post #: 41900695
Share

Originally posted by jambo12 ↑

Leave it to the TDS to cut off quotes halfway as usual.

”We did not find documentary or testimonial evidence that political bias or improper motivation influenced the decisions.”

Means there was documentary evidence of political bias, Strzok and Page couldn’t reallly dodge that particular charge, there was also testimonial evidence of political bias, by Steele.

There was just no proof that the rampant bias exposed had the result of influencing the decision making, primarily by Bill Priestap, maybe not being as dumb as the others.

Bias, yes, documentary evidence of bias, yes, testimonial evidence of bias, yes, proof that it was the reason for the decisions made, lacking.

The smocking gun was smocking but they had nobody in a high enough position with their fingerprints on it.

Expand

"The smocking gun was smocking but they had nobody in a high enough position with their fingerprints on it. "

All that paint and yet no fingerprints or evidence of their activities left behind? I doubt it.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...

First 76 Last