Sorry, I just directly quoted the report where it clearly states "we did not find documentary or testimonial evidence", and you're very next sentence is "means there was documentary evidence" as proof that this report states the opposite of what it actually says? Are we living in the world of 1984? You literally admitted that there was no impact in the decision, so that should be the end of it, no?
Also, I have no idea what TDS is? But I was merely suggesting that ALL illegal/criminal/questionable acts should be investigated. I assume TDS is meant to paint be as some left-wing extremist, but I didn't think wanting both sides of the aisle cleaned of corruption was a left-wing idea.
