Baha'u'llah explicitly says
My friend, anybody can say whatever they want, there are many sects like the Mormons who have a different books eg The Book of Mormon: Another Testament of Jesus Christ, The Doctrine and Covenants, The Pearl of Great Price, and with Scientology having many others like “The Fundamentals of Thought”,
Plus the likes of Islam: The Quran, believed to be the literal word of God revealed to Prophet Muhammad.
Hinduism: The Vedas, Upanishads, and Bhagavad Gita, considered divine revelations and spiritual guidance.
Judaism: The Tanakh (Hebrew Bible), believed to be divinely inspired scripture.
Buddhism: The Tripitaka and other sutras, regarded as teachings of the Buddha.
Zoroastrianism: The Avesta, believed to be revealed to Zoroaster.
Sikhism: The Guru Granth Sahib, considered the eternal, divine word of God.
Indigenous religions: Often oral traditions or sacred stories believed to be inspired or revealed by spiritual beings.
As well as your Baha'u'llah
So my friend nothing new under the sky, anyone can claim what the like, its been done many times before and certain people believe them
"This is the changeless Faith of God, eternal in the past, eternal in the future."
There is not a problem at all here, agreed, God himself is changeless, same as Jesus, so it makes all the above list null and void, as it means God and Faith have changed, including in yours as your faith has changed, not the same as in the gospel, as Baha'u'llah have been added
Yes, Paul says if a new Gospel is preached, he should be under Gods curse, but this is not a new Gospel, it is the eternal Gospel, it is not a different Prophet, it is Christ Himself.
Christ human body is not the same Body as your Baha'u'llah, Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever, show us where Both Jesus and Baha'u'llah are the same person, have not changed in body
NO WHERE IN THE GOSPLE JESUS is referred to as Baha'u'llah, so there has been a change, now take yourself back to Eve, and see how crafty the snake was to make Eve fall, the same is happening here, by saying of they are the same
He simply as a new name, and even that isn’t unbiblical
Yes, it is unbiblical, as there is no verse in the bible saying Jesus name has been changed to Baha'u'llah, this is coming from a sourse outside the Gospel as it was handed down
Isaiah 62.2 specifically speaks of a "new name" who will bring righteousness to all nations, as does Rev 2:17 and 3:12
Read the bible correctly not out of context as these verses are referring to Isreal and believers, not to God or Jesus, that’s the big difference my friend
Isaiah 62:2 primarily refers to the restoration and honor of Israel as a nation, with the new name symbolizing that renewed identity.
Revelation 2:17 and 3:12 are personal promises to believers in the context of spiritual victory, faithfulness, or salvation, with the new name signifying a personal divine relationship.
To say that the name "Jesus" will be used when the Christ returns is a different gospel.
Absolute rubbish, The teaching that Jesus will return with a different name like Baha'u'llah who taught a different gospel is not in line with Christian beliefs. According to Christian doctrine, Jesus Christ is the Son of God, the second person of the Holy Trinity, and his teachings are central to the Christian faith. Any claim that deviates from this fundamental belief would not align with the teachings of the gospel
The Bible clearly states that Jesus Christ will return personally and visibly (e.g., Acts 1:11, Revelation 1:7).
The Bible emphasizes that Jesus' name and identity will be recognized at His second coming.
Baha'u'llah is the founder of the Baha'i Faith, not of Christianity or the Gospel.
Sorry
Expand
