"So my friend nothing new under the sky, anyone can claim what the like, its been done many times before and certain people believe them"
Do you not apply the principle of Matthew 7:15-20 here? Is that passage irrelevant to your investigation?
Do you not see that each of the religions you listed all had a "golden age" where the fruits of their Prophets were evident?
Do you think Christianity is the only goodly fruit in the world?
Do you close your eyes to al the bad fruits that Christianity has produced and continues to produce?
I think you are not being fair in your assessment in relation to the application of Matthew 7:15-20. These verses are there to test your spirit.
So I ask again. What is the bad fruit that Baha'u'llah is producing today, as we approach the "golden age of the Baha'i era"?
".... not the same as in the gospel"
Nothing has changed and in fact the Gospel is promoted to be even more effective than it has been in the past 2000 years. The Baha'i Faith brings the Gospel to have meaning for institutions, governments and nations as a whole. As Isaiah stated, the new name will bring righteousness to each and every nation
When you are encouraged in the Bible to look at the fruits, why would you not look at the fruits?
Instead of just saying the Gospel has changed, why would you not look at if the Baha'i Faith is the Will of the Father or not? And if not, what are the fruits of Baha'u'llah that ae not the fruits of the Bible?
Christ human body is not the same Body as your Baha'u'llah
Do you think a new name means the same human body? this is again, unbiblical
Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ is the same yesterday and today and forever, show us where Both Jesus and Baha'u'llah are the same person, have not changed in body
And in the same sentence and same breath you say this, knowing full well that you believe the human body of Christ changed from a natural body to a glorified body.
Not the same body then?
Or the same body?
It changed right?
So it's not the same Jesus Christ. Its a different Jesus Christ in a different body.
So clearly Hebrews 13:8 is not referring to the BODY, but the SPIRIT of Christ.Yes, it is unbiblical, as there is no verse in the bible saying Jesus name has been changed to Baha'u'llah, this is coming from a sourse outside the Gospel as it was handed down
When the Bible was first translated into Arabic, the name of Baha'u'llah was mentioned within it hundreds of times.
Isaiah 62:2 primarily refers to the restoration and honor of Israel as a nation, with the new name symbolizing that renewed identity.Revelation 2:17 and 3:12 are personal promises to believers in the context of spiritual victory, faithfulness, or salvation, with the new name signifying a personal divine relationship.
All 3 verses ae referring to the end times, and the new name of Baha'u'llah has brought honor to Israel. Ask the people of that nation. Ask the people of Haifa, Mount Carmel and the surrounding lands, what is the honor of that city and that land and the honor it brings the nation.
The Bible clearly states that Jesus Christ will return personally and visibly (e.g., Acts 1:11, Revelation 1:7).
And this is where the unbiblical comes in again. Jesus was taken up to heaven as a life-giving Spirit. He will return as a life-giving Spirit. Have you not read Joseph Ratzinger's book "Jesus of Nazareth"?
Kam
Expand
