Flat or Globe Earth?

Originally posted by The Disciple…: ↑

Kam,

You remain one of the most confusing and contradictory voices on this forum.

You quote Scripture as if it’s true, yet you reject the very foundation of that Scripture—Yeshua the Messiah. You discredit who He claimed to be, what He fulfilled, and what the Word clearly says about Him.

Then you cling to the Great Disappointment of 1844, trying to tie it to the rise of Baha’u’llah—a man who claimed to be God, yet fulfilled none of the prophecies of the true Messiah.

Yeshua fulfilled over 300 specific prophecies, backed by historical and spiritual accuracy.

Baha’u’llah fulfilled nothing except the warnings of Scripture about false prophets and deceivers who come in their own name.

Kam, when you try to support your faith with Scripture, you expose how shallow its foundations really are.

Your arguments twist back on themselves. You claim spiritual truth, yet repeatedly contradict the very texts you appeal to.

So let me ask you clearly—one question:

If you came to the knowledge that the 1844 timeline has no connection to Baha’u’llah whatsoever, and that it was a misinterpretation of Daniel’s prophecy, would you have the courage to denounce him?

Because here’s the truth:

If 1844 is exposed as false (and it has been time and time again), then your entire faith system collapses.

And at that point, you’re left with a choice—cling to deception, or turn to the truth: Yeshua, the Son of the Living God, who alone fulfilled prophecy, died for your sins, rose again, and is coming in glory.

I pray you’re ready to face that question with honesty—because your soul depends on it.

Expand

The entire faith system is not in any way reliant on 1844. 1844 confirms the faith system, which shows up the contradictions in Christian thinking, not Bahai thinking.

Tell me which part is incorrect.

1. Jesus came for humanity's salvation

2. Salvation is reliant on faith in Jesus Christ

3. Faith in Jesus Christ alone while I live my day to day life as a paedophile does not give me salvation.

4. Therefore salvation requires me to live my life in accordance to teachings found in the Bible. Be a good dad, be a good husband, be a good neighbour etc etc. Don't be abusive, don't be racist, don't be sexist, don't be lustful, don't be materialistic etc etc

5. To be good, as per point 4 above in a Christian way has given my community tremendous suffering.

6. Are you therefore saying that the suffering caused by the apathy and neglect of the Church in my community for centuries actually does lead to salvation?

Not caring about the suffering of my community leads to salvation?
(and no I'm not saying this happens in EVERY community but the church has had 2000 years of practice to do it, and this happens in many many communities I have served in and observed with my own eyes)

Now that's a contradiction.

Kam