Kam,
Let’s be absolutely clear—there is no “deal” to be made that would ever cause me to deny Yeshua. My faith is not built on interpretations or debates—it’s built on the unshakable truth of who He is: the Son of God, God in the flesh, the fulfillment of over 300 prophecies, and the only name under heaven by which we must be saved (Acts 4:12).
You’ve offered 1844 as a supposed fulfillment of Daniel 8:14 and others—but let’s not forget, 1844 was called “The Great Disappointment” for a reason. It was confusion, misinterpretation, and spiritual desperation dressed up as divine revelation. It was grasping for timelines without understanding their context. Baha'u'llah hijacked this confusion and positioned himself as its fulfillment—when he wasn’t even known at the time the prophecy supposedly ended.
Let me remind you:
Daniel 8:14 says, “And he said unto me, Unto two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.” This does not say 1844 or a new prophet will rise. It references the cleansing of the sanctuary—language familiar to the Day of Atonement and the Temple context—not the rise of a new religion.
Luke 21:24–27 describes signs in the heavens and the coming of the Son of Man in power and great glory—this did not happen in 1844.
Revelation 11:2 talks about the holy city being trampled for 42 months. Again, symbolic of tribulation and persecution, not the rise of your prophet.
As for the Zoroastrian and Hindu timelines—they are not Scripture. They are from religions that do not recognize Yeshua as Messiah. I follow the Word of God, not man-made calculations drawn from foreign religions.
Kam, I appreciate your willingness to say you’d denounce Baha'u'llah if these are disproved. But with love I say this: you don’t need more proof. You need repentance and faith in the only One who died for your sins and rose again—Yeshua.
There’s no other way. Not through a new prophet. Not through 1844. Not through external righteousness.
Only through Him.
