Flat or Globe Earth?

Originally posted by kambiz999 ↑

Haha yes there is no deal, because it is the most disrespectful thing to say to someone to deny their faith.
Sure you can provide proofs to foster understanding, thereby propelling someone towards the truth to decide ON THEIR OWN, but the sheer arrogance of to say "will you deny your faith"

Your post has holes all over it.

"1844 was called “The Great Disappointment” for a reason"

Of course it was a disappointment, Jesus was also a Messianic disappointment.

They Christians were expecting the stars to fall and for Jesus to return from the sky
They got a prisoner who did not even make the local news

The Jews were expecting a a Messiah sitting on the throne of David, a prince, and a son of David
They got a Nazarene carpenter, and born of a supposed virgin (they said)

The Christians were expecting everyone from the east to the west to instantly know Jesus had returned, like lightening.
They got a prisoner writing letters to the rulers of the earth from a prison cell.

The Jews were expecting a Messiah that will gather the Jews from where they were scattered
They got the realization that they were not scattered, so what is Jesus doing?

There are so many passages calling Jesus a false prophet, from Tacitus, Suetonius, Porphyry, Emperor Julian to Fronto

Baha'u'llah is in good company as a false prophet of some Christians.

"It references the cleansing of the sanctuary—language familiar to the Day of Atonement and the Temple context—not the rise of a new religion."

And yet when Jesus cleansed the sanctuary in His first coming, he started a new religion called Christianity.
Its ok for Jesus to do but not for Baha'u'llah right?

Baha'u'llah is in good company.

"Luke 21:24–27 describes signs in the heavens and the coming of the Son of Man in power and great glory—this did not happen in 1844."

Jesus too was supposed to come in power and great glory. A king no less, and to rule with a sword. Mount Zion was supposed to dance and it didn't
He was a carpenter. He did not come with physical glory and power but spiritual glory and power.

Baha'u'llah too was supposed to come with power, great glory, lightening, on a cloud, the sun would not give light and the heavens would split and stars fall rom the sky.
He was a prisoner nearly all His blessed life. He did not come with physical glory and power, but spiritual glory and power.

Baha'u'llah is in good company.

"As for the Zoroastrian and Hindu timelines—they are not Scripture."

This is why Baha'u'llah has come. Do you know how many millions of people worldwide, and in fact, how many thousands of people in your community population you are removing from salvation by this attitude?

I think that is enough for now.

Kam

Expand

Kam,
You can dress this up with poetic comparisons, but the plain fact remains: Baha'u'llah is not in the same league as Yeshua—he’s in contradiction to Him.

Yeshua was foretold by over 300 distinct prophecies—written hundreds of years before He came. Baha'u'llah, by contrast, fulfills none. No scriptural prophecy from Genesis to Revelation even hints at another Messiah figure coming “in the glory of the Father” apart from Yeshua’s literal return.

Let’s clarify a few things you’ve spun:
1. The “Great Disappointment” and 1844
Yes, the Millerites were wrong about 1844 being Yeshua’s return—but nowhere in Daniel 8:14 does it speak of a man starting a new religion. It speaks of the cleansing of the sanctuary—plain temple language—pointing to the Day of Atonement, not a Persian mystic. This was hijacked by the Bahá’í narrative in desperation to make their dates fit.

Your interpretation is torn from context and force-fit.

2. Luke 21 is NOT about 1844
Luke 21:24–27 describes the coming of the Son of Man in power and glory, “with power and great glory”, after signs in the heavens—not in secret, not as a prisoner, and not spiritually.
Revelation 1:7 says:
“Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him…”
Every eye will see Him. Not just a few disciples or pilgrims in the Middle East. When Yeshua returns, it will be global, unmistakable, and literal.

3. You claim Baha’u’llah is “in good company” with Yeshua
This is a deeply flawed and disrespectful comparison. Yeshua was sinless, fulfilled the Law and the Prophets (Matthew 5:17), rose from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:4–6), and is described in Philippians 2:9–11 as having a name above every name—before whom every knee will bow.

Baha’u’llah, by contrast:

Claimed to be the Father and the Comforter—utter blasphemy (see John 14:26; the Comforter is the Holy Spirit, not a man).

Denied the exclusivity of salvation through Yeshua, contradicting John 14:6 where Yeshua clearly said: “No one comes to the Father except through Me.”

Had no divine miracles, no sinless testimony, and no resurrection.

To say he “came in spiritual power” is an excuse, not a fulfillment.

4. Your appeal to Zoroastrian and Hindu prophecy
These are not divinely inspired Scriptures (2 Timothy 3:16). We do not build doctrine on pagan timelines. Salvation does not come through cultural consensus but through the Word of God and faith in Yeshua, the Son.
Acts 4:12 says:
“Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
That cancels out Baha’u’llah, Krishna, and any other false teacher.

5. Finally, your challenge of fairness
Kam, your passion is real—but it's been placed in a lie. You dodge key Scriptures, twist verses out of context, and refuse to address how Baha’u’llah contradicts the very Word of God you say you respect.

You need to repent and turn to the only One who can save—Yeshua the Messiah, crucified, risen, and returning again.
There will be no “Baha’u’llah” standing at the judgment seat—only Yeshua (John 5:22).

My prayer is that your heart softens before that Day comes.