Kam,
You can dress this up with poetic comparisons, but the plain fact remains: Baha'u'llah is not in the same league as Yeshua—he’s in contradiction to Him.
Yeshua was foretold by over 300 distinct prophecies—written hundreds of years before He came. Baha'u'llah, by contrast, fulfills none. No scriptural prophecy from Genesis to Revelation even hints at another Messiah figure coming “in the glory of the Father” apart from Yeshua’s literal return.
Let’s clarify a few things you’ve spun:
1. The “Great Disappointment” and 1844
Yes, the Millerites were wrong about 1844 being Yeshua’s return—but nowhere in Daniel 8:14 does it speak of a man starting a new religion. It speaks of the cleansing of the sanctuary—plain temple language—pointing to the Day of Atonement, not a Persian mystic. This was hijacked by the Bahá’í narrative in desperation to make their dates fit.
- Your interpretation is torn from context and force-fit.
2. Luke 21 is NOT about 1844
Luke 21:24–27 describes the coming of the Son of Man
in power and glory,
“with power and great glory”, after signs in the heavens—not in secret, not as a prisoner, and not spiritually.
Revelation 1:7 says:
“Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him…”
Every eye will see Him. Not just a few disciples or pilgrims in the Middle East. When Yeshua returns, it will be global, unmistakable, and literal.
3. You claim Baha’u’llah is “in good company” with Yeshua
This is a deeply flawed and disrespectful comparison. Yeshua was sinless, fulfilled the Law and the Prophets (Matthew 5:17), rose from the dead (1 Corinthians 15:4–6), and is described in Philippians 2:9–11 as having a name above every name—before whom
every knee will bow.
Baha’u’llah, by contrast:
- Claimed to be the Father and the Comforter—utter blasphemy (see John 14:26; the Comforter is the Holy Spirit, not a man).
- Denied the exclusivity of salvation through Yeshua, contradicting John 14:6 where Yeshua clearly said: “No one comes to the Father except through Me.”
- Had no divine miracles, no sinless testimony, and no resurrection.
To say he “came in spiritual power” is an excuse, not a fulfillment.
4. Your appeal to Zoroastrian and Hindu prophecy
These are not divinely inspired Scriptures (2 Timothy 3:16). We do not build doctrine on pagan timelines. Salvation does not come through cultural consensus but through the
Word of God and faith in Yeshua, the Son.
Acts 4:12 says:
“Nor is there salvation in any other, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved.”
That cancels out Baha’u’llah, Krishna, and any other false teacher.
5. Finally, your challenge of fairness
Kam, your passion is real—but it's been placed in a lie. You dodge key Scriptures, twist verses out of context, and refuse to address how Baha’u’llah contradicts the very Word of God you say you respect.
You need to repent and turn to the only One who can save—Yeshua the Messiah, crucified, risen, and returning again.
There will be no “Baha’u’llah” standing at the judgment seat—only Yeshua (John 5:22).
My prayer is that your heart softens before that Day comes.
