More conspiracy theories from
@wotsup are supported by his own theology, which is irrelevant to the question of who started the Christian church and who chose the material to include in the Bible.
You deny what I posted, while at the same time admitting what I stated about the CC deciding what material to include in the Bible, as in...
They simply selected from what was available, they didn't write it.
---They abandon a lot of it, leaving them with No other option, but to demand no Bible alone, because they know it exposes them.EX - ppm's lying claims, that the Only True God (Father) in John 17:3 is Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
And to try and support his lie, he claimed that you also needed to know their created unholy spirit person, as well as the Father and Son for eternal life and NO such lie exists in the Bible = His Father according to the Son = John 8:44.That is irrelevant to the question of who selected material to include in the Bible.
But to take up one of your points.
Just from this forum alone, the diverse views and contradictory statements that emerge from the Bible alone approach can be seen. Go with it if you like; it will provide you with boundless material to argue with your fellow Bible aloners.
As for the Father, Son, and Holly Spirit, the topic has already been done to death on this forum, so I won't flog the dead horse any more.