"The only understanding of God I have is the pagan concept?"
Why is that a surprise to you?
On these forums,we have had years of speaking about different concepts of God,origins etc
You stated you believe the trinity is the correct understanding of God.
Why the surprise then and question mark?
Pagan Rome became papal Rome,and transferred all the pagan beliefs and blended them with christian beliefs .
The concept of the trinity was defined and adopted in the council of Nicea,and entered christianity,this is a pagan concept of God adopted by the Roman church.
Christianity came out of Isreal hundreds of years earlier,were a monotheistic religion for thousands of years before this new concept by a new culture.
The hebrews and Jews never have,still dont believe in a trinitarian God,its pagan and fabulous.
"While you at please tell me what the non-pagan concept of God is."
Pagan God is a wrothful God that needs a sacrifice to be appeased.
With this understanding of God.
God was wrothful,and someone needed to die in our place ,this idiology says tjis Gods son took the hit for us so he didnt get us.
This concept totally changed the everlasting gospel,to a god,just as the pagan Gods needed to be appeased,God killed his son in our place.
Nothing more than a human sacrifice.
Have you not heard wotsup preach about the two Adams?
"Much of the RCC aligns with the Anglican understanding altough there are also differences. Fortunately they have ceased fighting over differemces."
Basically the same thing,Anglicanism is just a protest movement,that does not protest anymore because the concept of God is exactly the same.
Trinity
Penal substitution
"I don't know of any pagan beliefs held by the Angilican church so please tell me what they are."
The above beiefs for a start,and the start to my post reply to you.
"My belief in the existence of a God is not based on Angican or RCC doctrines or their understadings of God but on my own understanging of reality and of logic."
Well according to this,as you have stated previously,you are in agreement with their concepts of God ive seen many posts agreeing with ppm and the trinity and replies to myself.
In your replies to me on this thread,you have also stated about a killer God and spat that concept at me,even though,you know full well we have had many battles in regards to these two opposing concepts.
Do you have amnesia about these long discussions in regards to the son of God and thevtrinity and paganism?
"I have stated that I see no evidence to warrant my belief in a God."
I fully understand that,we ve discussed this for years
But the point in this discussion,is you agree with ppm etc that the Rcc concept is to be seen as the deafault cincept of who and what God is.
Why are we even going over this ground we have covered for many years?
You stated this is the concept the bible portrays,im only repeating what you have stated many many times,ive seen you discuss with ppm you see what he teaches is also aligning with the Anglican concept.
"I don't reject the idea becuase there may be evidence that I don't see, which, of course, depends on how I define evidence. If you call that trying "to weaponise like I hold the keys to destroy the concept of God" then you show how far from the truth you are."
Again,you totall miss the point
You spit the above concept of God ,a wrathful God ,like the verse you spat at me as some kind of evidence,that here look at this!
This is the rcc version of the concept of God you and others hold,its pagan.
So if i have clearly over the years disagreed with your take on what the bible says about God,why use that concept at me,when ive stated for years i hate the Roman concept,its a lie.
You have seen my posts and hated them when ive stated it is the anti christ power of rev 13 and 17 an institution that misrepresents the concept of God.
"What you say I believe (what you call my default position) could not be further from the truth, "
I didnt say it,i repeated what you post
Its here this thread too about God wanting to kill homosexuals,what are you talking about you dont say these things???
"hey, you know better what I believe than I do."
How do you get that?
You say you believe the trinity,i didnt say that,you did
You said to ppm the anglican concept aligns with rcc and you agreed with this,i read it,i didnt make it up,it was your writing,i just believe you when you say this is what you believed,nothing all to do with me.
"You tell me that you are not trying to tell me what I believe which which is false."
I repeated what you told the forum
---
"Over to you, but I suggest that you stop digging with false statements becuase you have already dug yourself into a hole."
No need too.
Ive just repeated what you have said,are you denying now you have not said you believe the trinitarian concept is the correct concept?
Are you also denying you said Peter is the head of christianity?
That Jesus said Peter was the rock?
Are you denying that you said the Rcc is the christian concept that represents biblical teachings?
Ive seen you and ppm agree on all the above,are they not true?
I did not make any of that up,i repeated what you have conveyed to the forum
