When a Revelation is given wotsup, and the Word of God is spoken for mankind to be guided for centuries to come, that word "has" is used to describe it.
Baha'u'llah HAS spoken in this age.
This word "has" does not mean that it is the final word, especially when it is preceded by the words "these days"
It is grammatically consistent to assume that God will speak again when "these last days" are over.
Secondly, if it is done and dusted, you contradict yourself by saying that God continues to speak to individuals. In fact the words "done and dusted" contradicts that the Spirit of truth will guide us into all truth.
When all truth has not been given and "will be given" when the Spirit of truth comes, then nothing is "done and dusted"
Thirdly, if you trying to assert that the "MEANS" has changed, then I ask you why Matthew 7:15 talks about Prophets and their connection to the fruits that they produce?
All very connected and you fall into contradictions if you deny that when Christ returns, He comes with a new name, a new identity and you will know by the fruits He produces. These fruits will give you clarity as to whether it is a true Gospel or a false Gospel.
