No wotsupThe English language uses the word "has" to mean it...

  1. 4,920 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 11
    No wotsup

    The English language uses the word "has" to mean it happened before the time of writing.

    When Paul wrote his epistles, he wrote AFTER the life of Jesus who spoke the Word of God.

    This is why the words "has" and "spoken" is used. It is not an indication that the Word of God is "done and dusted"

    This is basic English grammer.

    I don't keep ignoring your comment that God himself interacts with individual people.
    You can believe that, and it has an element of truth to it, but it has nothing to do with Christ returning as a Prophet with a new name producing good fruits, (and no bad fruits) which is a means for the people to be resurrected in Him. And He won't be silent. He will speak, and His Word is the Word of God.

    "In the exact same form"

    What is that form wotsup?
    How do you know that Jesus was not in the exact form that Baha'u'llah was in?
    On the road to Eramaeus, the didn't recognise His form
    He appeared to Paul as a flash of light

    So what does the religion of wotsup say is the form?

    And your claim that the new name is "Word of God" is frankly bizarre and unbiblical according to most people on the planet throughout history.

    To think that Jesus will return and say "Hi guys, my name is Word of God, that's my new name as prophesied in Isaiah 62"

    Can't stop shaking my head as to how far the human imagination can stretch amongst the most intelligent species on the planet.

    Kam
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.