Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Simple answer is that anyone who gives their valuable property...

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
kingpins

26,699 Posts.

40

27/06/15

11:13

Post #: 15540919
Share

Originally posted by liveforsunnydays ↑

Can someone help to justify this?

broad example
$300 p/w or $15,600 p/a x 8% = $1,248
$450 p/w or $23,400 p/a x 8% = $1,872

Does the $450 p/w rental really get the extra care to justify the extra $624? Or does it really just get the exact same treatment as the $300p/w rental? What would 'extra care' involve?
If not, then why is there not more use of a flat fee per residence? Why is the usage of a standard percentage rate so prevalent?

Expand

Simple answer is that anyone who gives their valuable property to a wet behind the ears young girl to manage has rocks in their head and deserves to pay through the nose
2 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

MEK

Meeka hits 15cps on gold pour – can it keep growing past +330% YoY?

RAC

Race Oncology accelerates gamechanging cancer drug

Listen: HotCopper Wire Podcast 015 – Yeah, we're thinking the IPO market is back

AII

Almonty Industries shares EXPLODE! Rheinmetall, Renk, and Hensoldt left in the shadows!

DMP

Domino's sinks -16% in early trades as another chief player exits ship

First 2 Last

SPONSORED BY