--- "But it’s not clear that Prelude is any more cost effective...

  1. 2,669 Posts.
    -
    -
    -



    "But it’s not clear that Prelude is any more cost effective than building land-based plants. The estimated capital cost is between $10.8 billion and $12.6 billion for Prelude’s 3.6 million tonne per annum capacity. This gives a cost of $3.5 billion per million tonnes of annual LNG capacity.

    This is more expensive than the three LNG plants being built on Australia’s eastern seaboard that will be the first to use coal-seam gas as a feedstock. The Queensland Curtis project, operated by BG Group, has a capital cost of $2.4 billion per million tonnes of annual capacity, the Gladstone plant being built by Santos and Malaysia’s Petronas is at $2.37 billion and the Asia-Pacific LNG plant of ConocoPhillips is $2.74 billion".

    http://gulfnews.com/business/opinion/hope-floats-for-australia-s-lng-plans-1.1331850
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.