To some enquiries on "who paid for appeal?"; the Appeal was...

To some enquiries on "who paid for appeal?";
the Appeal was dismissed with costs, WC to pay.

So far no firm dismissal of Judge Perram's involvement in
Yes/No to confidential settlement terms; still to be announced.

Court's pronouncement of "it must be in the best interests of members"
still applies.

Well, these are my hallucinations from today; which are yours?

Sure, some debris are afloat together with many bewildered among us,
but as the saying goes: It ain't over til' the fat lady sings.

Cheers,