In part one, I showed how the New York Times deceives readers about the safety and effectiveness of the influenza vaccine by grossly misrepresenting its own sources from the medical literature. In fact, while the Times characterizes one source as though vindicating CDC policy, it actually went so far in its criticism of the CDC as to accuse the agency of deliberately misrepresenting the science to support its policy.
In part two, you'll learn much more about how the CDC deceives the public:
How the CDC views it as a "problem" that more and more people are becoming health literate
How the CDC's estimates of influenza hospitalizations and deaths may be greatly overestimated
How the CDC's claims that the vaccine confers a huge reduction in mortality among the elderly have been thoroughly discredited by the scientific community
How the vaccine appears to actually increase transmission of the influenza virus
How corruption is endemic at the CDC
How public vaccine policy violates the right to informed consent.
