Really helps when the customers validate the treatment, technology, application, results etc. Mind you, report is done by, and audited by, Sichuan Tibet Innovation Centre, not FLC, although the script is very similar to the script presented by FLC presenters.
The users in STIC have no incentive to sign off against this unless they believe it. FLC doesn’t have that kind of political clout to hold a gun against the customer’s head and say “write it”.
In China, there is a rivalry amongst the bureaucrats. If they stake their names and reputations against the report, such calls will add to your credentials. They will be promoted if MABR delivers. If not, they will be sidelined. Meritocracy is based on how good your calls are. Such a culture flows up the chain of command. Hence, the reason for these reports.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
