Unfortunately Chrysalis was unable to exclude bias from his/her post.
After opening with the statement "Fluoride a known poison continues to be pumped into our water supplies for the supposed benefit to children's teeth" we are well warned of what is to follow.
Where in the literature Chrysalis is there any doubt as to the benefits of fluoride that entitles you to use the word "supposed"? Oh and make sure you put poison in the first line of the post.
Unfortunately there is a significant credibility gap when crackpot amateurs quote crackpot scientists who do unrepresentative research studies to gain some traction for their personal views.
I wish we didn't have to add any chemicals to our water supply but unfortunately we do. Let's hope an anti caries vaccine is discovered soon so that the caries preventive benefits of water fluoridation are no longer necessary.
Oral health of children in Aust has taken a turn for the worse in recent years as parents/children often tend to use rainwater or bottled water.
On a positive note Chrysalis at least you were able to write fluoride and not flouride.
