Food for Thought, page-2

That is generally very good advice but as you've said, BIG had its own unique reasons for its final demise.

What it didn't have, that ISX does is the following:
1. Tight regulatory controls and reporting.
2. Principle Licensing Agreements with VISA and Mastercard.

Both SIGNFICANT GOVERNMENTAL AND GLOBAL CORPORATE DILIGENCE HURDLES.

3. Significant progress toward profitability per the August update. Obviously requires extrapolation based on the June 30 update.
4. Patent technology process.
5. Massive global market reach.
6. Unique timing moving into more stringent AML regulatory environment.
7. Momentum against a poorly technology capital invested establishment.
8. A company that has responded clearly to each of the media insinuations and provided the facts (they are accountable to do so regulatorywise, where the media is only accountable to its shareholders - where does the true tension for integrity lay?)

Each person DYOR but at least spend sometime doing it understanding the motivation of both sides and why medium long term ISX is a belter!