for those that know me , page-28

riverview, if you read the full article, near the end of it, though they, at the time (in January), think hauling it away is a possible solution, they are still very worried about possible contamination to the area where it is hauled to thereby causing more headache in the future. I think that is why they are very keen with Bauxol. If it can solve the problem in situ, then at least the risk is only with this one same area instead of possibly contaminating another area. And judging from the past performances of Bauxol in all other trials which it has passed with flying colors each time, what do you think is the chances of Bauxol failing here? Almost zero. Hence, what is the chances of that US$25m going into VTI's coffer?...almost 100%. Of course, nothing is 100% because there could be political reason, etc, but if based on performance of Bauxol alone, I dare say it cannot fail to get this contract.

Cheers.