philippsm,
"Vertigos posts were factual and extremily well researched and given the number repetitive inaccurate posts he refuted I thought he/she always showed plenty of respect and patience."
I found his posts on the ESI MNM coal drying comparison evasive , non factual and resorted to personal attacks when he could not make an argument. Few posters saw through his twisting of the facts.
I am still waiting for answers to questions that he pretended he had answered.
Full marks to the mods for uncovering whatever he may have done wrong.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AUL
- for what it's worth...
for what it's worth..., page-12
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 27 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)