Some facts to back up your position would be most helpful to this discussion.
1. Fortune has been discussed at length on this site previously and I can't really be bothered rehashing past discussions now.
Ans to question 1 - I call bullshit on this one. I have been an active member of this forum. I do not remember any discussions of Fortune (TSX:FT).
2. Their native title issues are completely different to Atrum, so despite being geographically close, they may as well be thousands of miles apart'
Ans to question 2 - I call huge bullshit on this one. The native title issue is completely the same. They are 40km apart geographically and 20,000 years together politically.
3, Atrum has no native title issues, so there is nothing for them to say. Fortune has plenty, which is why they are trying to address them in the recent presentation.
Ans to question 3 - Even huger bullshit than 1 and 2. Please do your research and and visit the visit the
Tahltan, Gitxsan & stakeholder
Fortune Minerals, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 64 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add ATU (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $13.22M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
| ATU (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable