For me I would prefer that this is kept as a last resort as I would get higher overall ownership from a 30% sell down of SDV. Note that this assumes lithium carbonate equivalents of:
MC 20kT/a
SDV 25kT/a
JB 20-25kT/a
A 30% sell down of SDV is only 7.5 kT/a (10%-12%) difference as opposed to an outright 25% cut in share value.
No doubt SDV will outlast MC so at some stage would then be looking to reassess options but until then, I would say the best option is to keep CRs minimum.
In consideration I would support a higher debt facility instead. I'm guessing that the preferences are a debt facility with a combination of prepayments and a sale down of some description will be strongly considered first. I would personally prefer leveraging MC income to increase the debt short term to get things going but that's just my opinion.
I am looking forward to seeing the researchers revise their targets again.
GLTA
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- GXY
- Fortune teller
Fortune teller, page-3
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add GXY (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online