Yeah, it is absolutely bloody shocking that tens of billions of dollars of subsidies are given away in 'Global warming', 'Local air pollution', ...
I'm gobsmacked that they haven't included 'Entropy increase' or 'Use of the Earths oxygen' or 'Increasing the mass of the atmosphere'; the latter of which will cause the Earths rotational speed to decrease, affecting local space-time frame dragging, causing satellite orbits to reach tipping points and plunge to Earth, causing local air disturbances, seeding the formation of super-hurricanes (butterfly effect), that wipe low-lying islands and coastal communities off the face of the Earth. Not to mention the longer hours of daylight will accelerate curtain fading, requiring more frequent replacement, increasing waste and demand for new cotton, increasing demand for water by Cubby Station (now owned by the Chinese), drawing more water from the Murray-Darling, causing a water shortage in Adelaide, causing an increase in deaths by dehydration.
But then that is the (virtual) reality of these pathetic little dope smoking greenocrats with junk degrees, probably from Kellog's University (on special at Woolies this week).
And everything we put on this blog is stored at a server farm that has to run 24/7 so has to be powered 24/7, and even if it was powered by windmills and lithium batteries the Li and Co and Steel had to come from mines that used trucks running on subsidised diesel. If the Warmies really believe that the diesel is subsidised then they should feel morally bound to pay extra for materials used in green energy and benefitting from diesel subsidies so they can maintain claim to the moral high-ground.