Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Lol.More beard stroking and no facts The delusion of the deniers...

First 145 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
acorn

36,950 Posts.

4

10/05/24

13:15

Post #: 73763558
Share

Originally posted by Johilo returned: ↑

True
output v cost is the metric.

Solar panels start at a considerable discount with daylight v sunlight hours and
wind similar in that it does not blow all the time, regardless of location.
Additionally, the cost of extended transmission capacity and power loss from remote areas has an impact.

The longevity of solar and wind infrastructure and necessity to replace considerable capital inputs every c.20-25 years,
without subsidies (incentives for developers) and necessitated increased tariffs for consumers as a consequence change the economics from standard models.
Interestingly, the environmental cost has not been quantified and is becoming a major concern re biodiversity and aesthetics.
I'm not against renewables just the 'Mad ' rush to institute a one sized fits all approach, when it is clear that there are many variables need addressing without a globally devised equitable plan and likelihood of targets being met on quite contested science.

Expand

Lol.

More beard stroking and no facts

The delusion of the deniers is hilarious.
4 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

IR1

IRIS Metals sniffs 75 metres of lithium in South Dakota, pushing share price up 9.99%

LVH

Livehire sees share rocket 91% on takeover bid by Humanforce

ORP

Orpheus delays drilling at South Australian play Frome, on traditional owner advice

Bitcoin: Current State of Play & Where to Next | Swyftx

Emerald & Azure score Digger & Dealer awards

There are more pages in this discussion • 143 more messages in this thread...

First 145 Last