Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nice round number, enabling a neat one in four to be referenced...

First 53 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
picastoc

28,753 Posts.

424

15/03/19

19:00

Post #: 37779807
Share

Originally posted by boomeronrations ↑

Hi Pugsley,
The really interesting bits of the PBO testimony are contained in what hard figures they produce in their full report. Basically they don't fit with the rhetoric.
There is little evidence to support their view, it almost as if they arrived at a figure that would produce a number acceptable to the ALP, then worked their way back.
Would you find it credible the idea that the effect, in aggregate , of all the various behavioral responses , would be equivalent to 25 percent of SMSF ff divis being diverted to essentially pooled funds?

Now, ask yourself, why would the other 75 percent , be ignored?
Would you ignore a loss, when it is easily avoided?
cheers

Expand

Nice round number, enabling a neat one in four to be referenced when discussing this issue. Laughingly referred to as a "guesstimate" and no more valuable for the purpose than its author's body part from where it was likely to have been drawn.
Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

CC9

Chariot locks in high-potential drill target at Black Mountain, one of the USA's largest lithium landholdings

HIQ

Mouthguard concussion sensor tech developer HIT IQ wins second US patent

SVL

Silver Mines pushing ahead with NSW Bowdens project despite green group setback over power lines

The Rising Tide: How institutional adoption is shaping the future of crypto

TRE

Toubani raises $10M to see Mali's Koubada Gold Project through to DFS

There are more pages in this discussion • 16 more messages in this thread...

First 53 Last