"Exactly that's why it should be scrapped!"
It's the exact reason it shouldn't be scrapped!
"We are going round in circles, you clearly don't see the issue & how it is a subsidy."
I clearly see your issue, it's that I don't believe what you are presenting is factual nor do I agree with your opinion and the impact it will have.
If I don't have a negatively geared property, but I work and at tax time I have genuine expenses that I claim against my tax, I get a refund for paying too much tax.
It is not a subsidy!
If I negative gear a proper, I have income and expenses, if I get a refund it's because I have paid too much tax, I get a refund.
It's not a subsidy!
Take care!
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Franking Credits
Franking Credits, page-68
- There are more pages in this discussion • 140 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
I88
INFINI RESOURCES LIMITED
Charles Armstrong, CEO
Charles Armstrong
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online