if TA1 and TA2 really are the same system geologically as others...

if TA1 and TA2 really are the same system geologically as others have (Donnie?) have expressed they could be, the implication of depth of TA1 shown in your sat images, bodes very well for potential depth at TA 2 and the overall exploration target.

With the Exploration target highlighting that they only used a depth of 300m for the wireframe and depth assumptions of the target areas.


Even though theyd drilled to a depth of 450m at the start of August, and it very much looks like they've gone much deeper since.

Then all the comments from Tony and all the images of TA1 getting thicker at depth.



The implication that I'm inferring is that the exploration target for TA1 is very very conservative, and if TA2 is part of the same system it too could go very deep and the 300m depth assumption could also be conservative, and the exploration target could get blown out of the water.

or be accurate, I dunno what I'm doing.