"For example, all the big players have bought at 8c, BOA sold at 6.8c part of their holdings to short the stock. They will accumulate to drive it up again to 6.8c and beyond."
A) there is no evidence that all the big players bought at 8c - ten large instos backed the CR from an underwriting point of view, but they are hardly willing buyers.
B) sold @ 6.8 to short the stock - what evidence do you have to make this claim? At 6.8c as I have shown on several occasions the underwriters came out with a small profit.
C) 'They will accumulate to drive it up again to 6.8 and beyond' - really?
You present these comments as if they were somehow statements of fact. IMO, pure fairy dust ramping to cover your bets.
"Why on earth would you ignore that and sell at 5.3c, or 5.5,or 5.6c., in fact you should buy a truck and load more shares at these historical low levels and be ready to cash when the party starts."
Is this advice? Just more ramping.
"You have no idea, how big I went this time and at very low prices."
Oh dear - now we really are ramping big time. Frankly unless you are prepared to post the amount on the day, buying and selling, then why would anyone believe you after your recent escapades where you refused to answer the valid questions about your previous claims.
"Next week at AGM, we will find out who is the smart and who is-----------------."
Are we expected to infer that you have some special information about the AGM (this is the second time you have posted to this effect), or is it yet again just one more attempt to ramp the SP for the poor suckers who got done over the last time you went in for a couple of M shares and then sold out the day after you claim it would be silly to see at the current prices.
You may be right and the SP may go up, but it may not, and you posts are so full of ramp material it makes HC look like a boiler house.
Fairy Dust - round 2.
Post # 1
LYC Price at posting:
6.0¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
(20min delay)