I would have thought $50m, while it sounds impressive is a spit in the ocean by comparison to the asset, even if bridging or other was required to cover sale completion, not too mention the pattersons report noting: "A BIG POINT....."mae is fully funded to permit expenditure throughout the sale process"."
lets not forget shareholder value also equates to 'owner' value.
I would have thought $50m, while it sounds impressive is a spit...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)