from todays melbourne herald sun, page-56

karlo

can you please answer this question

is the problem with mfs its short term debt level or a problem with its business. if mfs did not have to pay any short term debt this year or next as an example would the company still make forecast $490 million ebitda 2008 and $273 million npat?

im struggling to understand how a short term financing issue can destroy on face value a highly profitable business. all businesses carry debt so why would 200 million short term debt close down such a highly profitable organisation

cheers