sorry gamblore but under arms length there is several conditions
they must act as if in open market
market rates and conditions, this applies in particular to taxable issues
in this case a building co would under normal conditions engage a bricklayer to upgrade or produce an asset, IF and I say IF FBR attempts to qualify this contract under arms length , then it wont pass the test of normal conditions.
from a purely taxable situation
Archistruct would have a expenditure that under normal conditions would provide an asset subject to taxable implications.
Frst contractor in Europe to introduce robotics to construction projects, page-12
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add FBR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.001(2.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $156.1M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.6¢ | 3.6¢ | 3.4¢ | $348.4K | 9.959M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | 5400087 | 3.4¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5¢ | 362366 | 4 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 13.32pm 09/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| FBR (ASX) Chart |