This is a follow-up on my 31 May post and borrowed from a recent post on the uranium board. I still have seen almost no reporting on the (pardon the alliteration) Daiichi-Daini dichotomy. I don't think you can overstate the importance of this story as it relates to the future of nuclear power and our investment in miners like PDN
----
Interesting article related to a previous post on Fukushima. The newer reactors were hit by the same earthquake and tsunami and are just fine, thank you.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304887904576395580035481822.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories
Fukushima Daiichi showed the failings of a 40-year old design. Fukushima Daina showed the robustness of newer designs.
This is the first major new report that looks deeper into the causes of the Fukushima disaster. It bodes well for the future of nuclear power and poorly for its Cassandra critics.
This is a follow-up on my 31 May post and borrowed from a recent...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PDN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$12.48 |
Change
0.060(0.48%) |
Mkt cap ! $3.724B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $12.45 | $12.76 | $12.26 | $26.57M | 2.124M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6286 | $12.47 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $12.48 | 5038 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 28/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| PDN (ASX) Chart |