CGB (ASX) Future of Medicinal Cannabis

Originally posted by Neil1959: ↑

Hi @cptchop. I requested my two previous posts to be removed and will address your post as a right of reply.

Every member of this forum has a right to post content based on what they believe is right, which I appreciate you acknowledged in your opening remarks.

As to 1.why I am still posting and 2.my track record:
1. I am a shareholder who openly declares previous interests with the company, CGB, in my signature.
2. My track record shows that I am a data researcher. It also states that as a rule, I do not attack, belittle or undermine other posters. I always try to help through clarification or at times apologise, or withdraw posts based on if I am wrong or I may feel the post no longer contributes to the debate.

You state in your posts: I quote...
"an industry which has been plagued by companies like CGB who have a management (maybe other than Andrew K) who looked to just cash in to the weed rush with absolutely ZERO direction."

As a significant shareholder, who has been at the coalface of this company for the past 2.5 years, I reject and strongly disagree with the premise 45526980.... the company's management is looking to cash in on the weed rush and has Zero direction. (sic)

@cptchop I would be interested to read any factual documents that support your conclusions.

....59

Expand

ok I disagree with almost everything you’ve said above but my posts seem to get moderated every time I try to address it.

in relation to your comments strongly disagreeing with my point regarding the cashing in on the weed rush. How do you explain their misguided pivot out of bauxite to the weed business meanwhile not following through on any of their promises to shareholders relating to the bauxite business. Having spent 2.5 yrs on the coal face surely you’ll be able to provide some great insight into this?

so just so we have it notes you strongly disagree that a business in a vastly different field that they were failing miserably in then transitions into an emerging fickled market like the weed business is not by definition ‘trying to cash in on the weed rush’. What part do you strongly disagree with?