My point is that any comparison to Linc is fraught with danger....

  1. fss
    689 Posts.
    My point is that any comparison to Linc is fraught with danger. Linc is the most advanced UCG company in terms of:

    - Technology/Expertise in UCG (Yerostigaz)
    - Trial plant commissioning
    - Personnel - Technical and Non-technical. You should see some of the people they've hired. For example an ex Rio operations manager.
    - Media exposure
    - Government recognition (Mcfarlane is talking about CTL every week)
    - International awareness + MOU's
    - International investment from prospective users of the technology, not just some investment bank that'll bail at the first sign of trouble.
    - Management - need I say more?

    And thats just what I can think of off the top of my head.
    Linc is on a completely different ballpark my friend, and the proof is in the pudding as they say. Trying to say they both share a bright future is laughable IMO.

    Btw Dr. Walker and Dr. Blinderman weren't the only two individuals who were responsible for UCG. Contrary to what many people think, some of the world's greatest medical/scientific discoveries were made by the lab assistants of the individuals who ultimately got credited with it. There's some food for thought. You talk as if Dr Walker himself swam down to the coal seem and lit the gas lol.

    Don't have false confidence in sub-par investments - always bet on the best horse! You may get that opportunity in the coming days.
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.

Currently unlisted public company.

arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.