Ok...2nd try.
S I'll restate my position...again! With shorters (they know who they are) it's never personal...it's just an anonymous Avatar like both of us...let's keep that at the forefront of our thoughts at all times...means true agendas are never certain...anonimity ensures that first principle.
So...again...it isn't shorting I take issue with. It's manipulative posts that by design (and I suspect in a coordinated fashion) that undermine without substance and are designed to treeshake and promote the short agenda.
You've followed the action and you're entitled to draw your own conclusions. If we differ then so be it. Some shorters like Hot Tuna those have pulled these stunts before as I have stated and linked. If you find her credible...all good...I did by best to expose those acts to posters on this thread...and if I recall correctly even before I vested.
Now...if you don't like my particular style of post...what can I say?...hit ignore...easy fix. Anyway, I'll continue to do as I do...I'll call it as I see it and will continue to deal with each post on it's merit.
Generally if I'm in a stock it's because I like the stock and will support it (unless it's a DT and I rarely indulge in that type of trade)...otherwise I'm not in the stock in which case I don't comment...except for posts like this that are directed to me. I have nothing to hide and keep an open profile. Can't get every trade right and this is the second that's sorely disappointed me this financial year. Sure it won't be the last either...
Again, I am not writing off this stock as there are too many unknowns for me with recent ann which saw me exit promptly (today's anns didn't improve things though). Anyway...it was that ann that raised my radar like everyone else. My exit strategy is to preserve capital so that's what I did...other's follow their own strategies.
Now...let me assure you...whenever I sense buggery of the type practised by she who must not be named...I will go on the offensive...it's not that I get joy from it...it is to ensure the exposure of the techniques employed...the constant undermining posts every ten mins...the grind I call it. She isn't alone...there are many on HC threads...and I'll keep on keeping on. She who must not be named didn't get this call right on analysis she got it right by sheer fluke. The longs here...were the ones that contributed sensible temperament to a BS report.
There remains much yet to be answered here and I'm on the sidelines watching...and waiting...
So bottom line? SHE can change her posting methodology by simply stating her position and stating the issues ONCE or within a REASONABLE number of posts that capture the essence of her position. No ossue with contrarian views from me I assure you...I often commend such genuine posters...in fact I dupport them...happy to link you in if you want proof...just tag me from outside this board. But that's not what happened on this board...there was no coirse of contrarian view...this was a course of self-serving domination in virtually all associated threads on virtually a full time basis. To me that doesn't click...and it's not the first time she's done it.
As has been alluded to...(remember first principle above)...I suspect she is not a punter...I suspect she is an employed and dedicated PR Avatar...but that's just my anonymous opinion. Given there's the possibility of a class action afoot...which I'll likely join if it proceeds...first thing I'll be suggesting (more likely demanding) is a subpoena...I would dearly love to check my hypothesis.
If it does prove correct
... think I'll just leave it at that for now...
DYOR, cheers and best wishes and to all longs...and all that have crystallised losses... commiserations...for those that continue to hold...may a $5 T/O bid fall from the sky!
To the shorts that did it the right way...good luck...you had a hell of a ride.
To the others...Court can be a really ugly place...life changing sometimes!
