GAL Discovery Hole NRC266 versus CNJ/GSR Discovery Hole MTJV001, page-49

Hi OldGeo,

I had meant to ask your opinion on whether it was a coincidence that around 90% of the planned drills were within the existing resource, but never got around to it.

The bit that really got me excited to the possibility that the MTJV might have a bigger portion than GAL was not our drill plan, but that almost the entirety of GAL's exploration targets were within their portion of the Ni Co resource.

I did wonder if the shallow resource was a similar geological event to the PGEs we are now targeting? Obviously a lot of time in between, but from the same pipe/fault?

You have mentioned previously that the sediments, and the fact that they may be fluid altered was a very interesting feature. Could you elaborate on this when you have time? Or maybe just point us to a resource where we could read up on its possible significance?

Out of curiosity I overlaid the combined GAL MTJV resource over the top the area a few weeks back, and have attached it below.
(Forgive the quality and scale is not super accurate).