GAME OVER........, page-3

Game over?
Really?
I'm no lawyer but here is something to read:

http://www.atns.net.au/atns/references/attachments/Llewellyn_Tehan.pdf

GG is hoping that a Federal court will de-register the ILUA under section 199C.
But is it the case that RWD already has a mining lease which is a "future act"?
And is it the case that:
"the future act remains valid despite removal of an ILUA from the register."

All the so called "investigative journalism" is little more than a rehash of what Desert argued on HC.
They have had 3-4 years to apply to the federal court. It's not hard finding the necessary S199C form online.

Who knows, I'm just speculating.