CTP central petroleum limited

The Hornsdale development should be a key example on the pros...

  1. 438 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 159
    The Hornsdale development should be a key example on the pros and cons of battery technology.

    The Hornsdale project was developed in 2016/17 for $90m with a generation capacity of 315 megawatts, and a published capacity factor of approximately 40%. That implies average production of 125MW of electricity per day.

    The 50MW battery extension at Hornsdale was a cost of $70m. At this cost 125MW battery storage costs $175m. With the $90m development of Hornsdale, guaranteed next day production of 125MW totals $265m.

    As Ash pointed out, renewables producer IFN paid $60m for Visy's 125MW fast start powerplant to provide firming capacity to it's renewable generation.

    This should demonstrate the economics of gas providing a low cost transition for renewables.
    .
    Last edited by numeraire: 02/09/20
 
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
(20min delay)
Last
5.5¢
Change
-0.004(6.78%)
Mkt cap ! $40.98M
Open High Low Value Volume
5.7¢ 5.9¢ 5.5¢ $99.84K 1.774M

Buyers (Bids)

No. Vol. Price($)
2 108144 5.4¢
 

Sellers (Offers)

Price($) Vol. No.
5.6¢ 88421 1
View Market Depth
Last trade - 12.12pm 23/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ?
CTP (ASX) Chart
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.